i really really dont like it.
when my friend first saw it she asked what it was and when told it was the olypic logo she asked which year was it from.
i think if people didnt see the olympic rings and london in the middle..(which is waaaay 2 small) then no one would be able to identify it as londons 2012 olympic games.
my friend said that she thought it was just random shapes placed together and was from the 1980's.
in my opinion the colours are garish and in your face...graffiti gone wrong. the shapes are not identifiable and the type is not anything interesting. this logo is causing epileptic seizures. thats saying something. the census has been so far that people dont like it as an olymipic logo but i think that the logo would be ok if it was for something other than for the olympics. it has no connections whatsoever to the games and is totally a million miles away from anything of previous games. its different though, i will give the designer that. if they were out to cause controersy and mayhem. then theve been succesfull.
1 comment:
maybe its biggest strength is its difference. your right nothing like controversal publicityin profiling an event quite a time away. 2012 doesnt read immediately. i thought i tyo could have been a tad bigger. good blog kimmy
Post a Comment